I did a little test with Epson Enhanced Matte (EEM) printed through the same ICC profile (QTR 2.3.0) and the ABW driver at "neutral" and three different paper type settings in the Epson driver: EEM, VFA and USFA (Ultra Smooth Fine Art). The ICC profile had been produced for EEM It now seems clear to me that there is more going on with these paper- type settings than ink load. Most notably, the USFA setting produced a distinctly, but subtly, warmer/yellower print. Other than that, the differences were less obvious and would probably only be seen in an A/B comparison. Density of the prints from low to high: EEM, VFA, USFA (the last two close). Color of the prints from cool to warm: EEM, VFA, USFA. Side by side these were distinct differences, particularly the difference between the USFA and the other two. I viewed the prints under pure 5K light measured for eveness across the three prints. Of the three prints, my preference was for the EEM setting because of the cool color and openess (lowest density). Whether this is a matter of chance because of the workflow (the ICC profile was created for EEM, etc.) I don't know. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > Here's a question for the programming talent here. Can we use the driver's > "media type" selection space to insert a simple monotone linearization > curve? Do we know where those files are and whether there is a way to hack > them -- that is, put our own inputs into that space? > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Followup: "Paper type" driver settings . . .
2005-10-15 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.