Digital BW, The Print

I have not averaged.  I don't think the Average module in MT works without
the dongle.


> From: wwodets <odets@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:19:21 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] i1 Target Scanning technique . . .
> 
> Steve, Ernst, John-
> 
> Thanks for all the responses.  I have been using the random target,
> 51 patches, strip read, the occasional glass of wine (but not two)
> and a white card overlaid with a piece of the same paper.
> 
> I have not been averaging multiple targets or reads, though I've done
> consecutive profiles and overlaid then and find them extremely
> close.  I imagine that this would have to be done by manually
> calculating the averages for each of the 51 steps and then entering
> them in the Measure Tool text file.  Is that correct, or is there
> something sleeker I'm not thinking of?
> 
> A sample of three is probably better than a sample of one, but
> *statistically* a sample of three (compared to thousands of prints
> done with the profile) is probably meaningless (small "N").
> 
> Thanks,
> Walt  
>