--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: The overall ink load with VFA, EEM, and HPR (almost) is fine. I have reduced ink load with the ink load adjustment in the driver and this doesn't correct non-linearities. Nor does the "density" slider. The light, normal, dark, etc. setting in the driver seems about shadow compression and the darker setting is what is compressing the shadows. You can see this in simply visually examining printed test strips. I believe that this is the correct control to use and will report the numbers tomorrow. Steve, also plesee see my last post about the soft proofing. What I didn't say there is that the canned Epson color profile provides about as good a soft proof as the 2.3.0 profile and a much better one than the 2.3.2 profile. Walt > > Yes I understand. Do you have a color density slider under paper > configuration? If so try lowering the overall ink load with this. > > > > From: wwodets <odets@c...> > > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:40:52 -0000 > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Create ICC Soft Proofing question . . . > > > >> > > Yes, I agree, but it is not the output of the printer that is not > > linearized, it is the output of the ABW driver + printer. That is why > > I am trying a profile on the light and normal settings in the driver. > > I believe that the normal setting is the linearized output per Epson's > > calibration and that is why "normal" is "darker." I'll report the > > numbers. > > > > I'll try the color profile for interest re the screen match. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Create ICC Soft Proofing question . . .
2005-10-24 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.