Sorry-- Yes, by "ink color" I mean "simulate black ink." --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <scho@m...> wrote: > > Do you mean simulate black ink instead of "ink color" in the > softproof dialog (CS2) ? Also, I agree that checking simulate paper > color and/or black ink when softproofing is not at all realistic > (even when looking away to avoid brain tricks). Just doesn't cut it > for me. Like putting a fog layer over the image. I get excellent > screen/print matches with neither of these options checked, using a > calibrated Apple LCD monitor. > > Carl > > > > I have discovered that the soft proofing is different in 2.3.2 than it > > was in 2.3.0, as follows: > > > > In 2.3.0, paper color can be selected but this does not automatically > > select ink color. This is a very accurate soft proof. It is not > > possible with any combination of soft proof settings to select ink > > color. > > > > In 2.3.1, when paper color is selected, ink color is automatically > > selected. There is no way to select paper color without ink color. > > > > With Epson canned color profiles, soft proofing works as with 2.3.0. > > > > Regardless of what has been said, the ink-color-checked soft proof > > does > > not provide an accurate soft proof of the print output with regard to > > darker tones. Having looked at BW photographs for 40 years, I am > > quite > > confident of that. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ICC Soft Proofing -- The issue . . .
2005-10-24 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.