I have not taken an extensive look but my GM i1 profiles allow checking ink black without checking paper white but not the other way around. The point Walt was making is that he would like to check paper white without checking ink black. Such combination is not possible with the GM profiles and I am not sure it makes sense anyway. The GM profiles don't have bkpt tags. None of the Epson 4800 profiles I looked at allow you to check ink black at all. None have a bkpt tag. When I was asking Phil Green about this tag he said words to the effect that it was "not a mandatory tag in the spec, you can put it in but you need an application that can make use of it." We're just a bunch of colour blind guys who don't know squat about colour, wandering around in the dark and grey. Perhaps this is illustrative of the ground we need to cover, who knows... > From: John Moody <moodymz3@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:12:21 -0400 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] ICC Soft Proofing -- The issue . . . > > I don't see any profiles that allow simulate paper color without simulate > black ink unless they don't have a bkpt tag, so its moot. Am I missing > something? > An interesting example is SPR2400 ProofingSemimatte.icm which does not have > a bkpt tag, yet SPR2400 PremSmgls PhotoRPM.icc does. > > Does that suggest Epson knows most people don't want to simulate paper black > while softproofing? If any profile were to be used for softproofing, I > would think ProofingSemimatte would be it. > > Best regards, > John Moody
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ICC Soft Proofing -- The issue . . .
2005-10-25 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.