> From: Tyler Boley <tyler@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:05:58 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: ICC Soft Proofing -- The issue . . . > > I see no consistancy here between the ability to preview paper white > and/or ink black, and the presence of wtpt and/or bkpt tags in the > profiles. > For one odd example, I have 2 profiles here, one will preview paper > white but not ink black, the other will do the reverse, ink black but > not paper white. They both have wtpt tags, no bkpt tags. > This preview ability could also be derived from the LUTs I agree. The wtpt tag is mandatory while the bkpt tag is not. It's either in the B2Ax tag(s) or the "gamt" tags. I am not familiar with the latter. We should probably ask the question over at Adobe's PS forums or perhaps the Colorsync list. We here are just guessing. >I would > think. But why some and not others? > Another unknown. Along with how to make great art. > T
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: ICC Soft Proofing -- The issue . . .
2005-10-25 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.