uncle uncleuncleuncle you are supremely adequate me... ...mmm ... not so much ah screw it, here we go... --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > > It's simple: in every description I've read of the two (perceptual vs > relcol+bpc) including that which I quoted below there is no stated > difference with regard to the greyscale axis. You claim, by virtue of > observation only, that there is a difference with regard to the greyscale > axis but can't adequately explain why. Observation works quite well thanks. I think that's one reason most of us accept that the world is not flat. The explanation seemed, and remains, adequate to me. At this point that's enough. > You dismissed my suggestion that > possibly a profile builder would want, when given the freedom the perceptual > intent gives him/her to do things any way he wants, to tackle the issue of > mapping black point in a manner differently to Adobe's BPC algorithm simply > because you "don't think they've ever been the same nor should be". I did not intend to dismiss any suggestion of yours. However the statement remains true to me at least. I made some attempt to explain why, perhaps inadequately to you, adequately to me. Also, this is a bit out of context. The statement was made as a response to this (as long as we're quoting each other)- " It's also interesting to note the difference in a soft proof using a GM i1 profile between perceptual (which has built-in BPC) and relative colormetric which does not. In a B&W world, one would generally expect these two to be the same." There was no dismissal on my part about what a profile builder might wish to do. You noted the different behavior between the two conversions, and claimed they should not be different. I replied that they are different, and why it made sense to me that they remain so. Color management remains somewhat mysterious to many, I certainly respect your dogged attempts for more technical clarity. However, when I see a statement that in my experience is in error or may confuse matters, I jump in. Again- Perceptual conversions vrs Relative Colormetric w/ BPC conversions behave differently here the vast majority of the time, it's definite, not refutable. In addition, that differing behavior makes some sense to me, and I won't attempt again to explain why. I would have hoped that the above observations would have helped your general inquiry into this whole issue. Again, for some reason, possibly the way we both write, we seem to descend into something that feels a bit "tit for tat". It's not my intention, and it's uncomfortable. So- uncle Tyler
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ICC Soft Proofing
2005-11-02 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.