> Todd, > > Tree. That would be the discussion we had about adjusting an 8-bit > image to the point of histogram meltdown vs. doing the same > adjustments in 16-bit where a smooth histogram is maintained but when > they are printed you can't tell the difference between the prints. In > other words maintain a smooth 8-bit histogram is not a requirement > for a good print and working in 16-bit space may not offer an > advantage to adjusting your average neg. > > Martin I remember that conversation, but where was the tree? Never mind, I just remembered. I've got to stop keeping these hours.... Todd PS, Tim, I don't think I was having the tree problem. I liked my tree. Martin was having a sky problem, but that came off a different scanner. That tip from Bruce I actually found more useful for my color images than BW, but I have no idea why that should be. > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Todd Flashner <tflash@e...> > wrote: >> >>>> Bruce Fraser shared a gem with me regarding doing the toning in >>>> Photoshop. >>> >>> So this handles the "tree" problem you were having? >> >> Sorry Tim, refresh my memory. >> >> Todd > > > If you do not wish to belong to Digital B&W, The Print, you may > unsubscribe by sending an email to: > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Developing RAW scans: for Martin
2001-08-13 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.