Thanks for your comments. I didn't post my initial findings with my original query since I didn't want to skew any responses. I bought a box of this paper and ran a few tests using a 4000 and UC inks, using an RGB generated grayscale and some color patches. I was going to profile it for color work, then if I liked it, for B&W. The best Dmax I got from this paper, using the Epson driver, was 1.55, which I considered pretty anemic, especially for the price. I tried a few different paper settings in the driver. Crane suggested the EEM setting, which I tried, but I also tried the VFA setting, both at 1440 dpi, SuperX microweave, No Color Adjustment, and all the high speed and edge smoothing features turned off. I also downloaded their custom profile for the 4000. It was weaker yet. Maybe there is a better paper setting in the driver that will lay down a more optimum amount of ink?? Any other thoughts would be appreciated. I suspect it is the nature of the paper, but there may be some settings I can tweak. Lou Dina --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Louis Dina" <lbdina@c...> wrote: > > Has anyone tried Crane Museao Max 365 gsm sheet paper? If so, what do > you think of it? What about Dmax and deep rich blacks? How does it > compare to other higher quality fine art matte papers. > > Your feedback is appreciated. The more details the better. > > Thanks, > > Lou Dina >
Message
Re: Feedback on Crane Museo Max Paper??
2005-12-01 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.