I think this is a good point. There are a lot of reasons for variations. Just in the printing the dithering has a pseudo random component. Which jets are used for the particular area you are measuring will most likely be different. Printer variation is there but its hard to characterize. Anyway, I decided to try this on my 2200-NK7. A 51-step does show some choppiness but curiously the posted reads had most of the problem in the lighter areas where as mine showed more in the darker end. There's a Photo Rag curve in the set that I created on my 2200 using QTR as opposed to the supplied Piezo curves -- it's the one starting with K7 instead of NK7. At 1440dpi this also shows choppiness mostly in thee dark region. I have two suspicions on the issue. First, is just that the large number of inks puts a more critical burden on all the transitions from ink to ink. Since there are more transitions and they happen more steeply. The other is the variable dotsize transitions. This isn't an issue for the 2200 at 2880dpi but does show up in 1440dpi. My 7500 has always been a lot smoother even before linearization, and the K6 inks bear this out too. So I've made some changes to dotsize transitions. I've usurped the old "Fast" dither algorithm which wasn't particularly good to try this out. Of the various print methods, using the K7 curve at 1440dpi (or super) and the Fast dither I get the smoothest and straightest overall curve. So for anyone who wants to experiment, try the K7-PhotoRag profile and the Fast dither. I'd be curious how this works on other printers. Roy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "wwodets" <odets@c...> wrote: > > John- > > In a recent test that Paul and I did we found that there was > significantly more variation in consecutive prints than in the > consecutive readings of any given single target. He was using a 220, > me a 4800. The print-to-print variations were not great, but my > memory is that they were about twice the reading-to-reading > variations. And let's not even mention consecutive prints in Dektol. > > Walt > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "John Moody" > <moodymz3@y...> wrote: > > > > And.... If you print the same target three times, you will get > slightly > > different results; small, but real. > > > > So that suggests, when getting down to the final tweaks, printing > more than > > target, give proper dry down time, measuring each target more than > once, and > > averaging all the measurements. A nozzle check before each target, > and > > after the last, for the overly obsessive. :-) > > Putting them all into a spreadsheet allows finding, and correcting, > the > > occasional outlier before averaging. > > > > I'm sure this procedure is not for everyone, but, there it is.... > > > > Best regards, > > John Moody > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of > Greg > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:53 PM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Low Dmax on Epson 2200 with K7 inks > response > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "joshhackney" > > <joshhackney@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Greg, > > > > > > Actually, there are 3 reversals between steps 26-28, 32-34, and > 38- > > 40 on the 51 random > > > step target data. > > > > > > > > > 0.1 L? That shouldn't be big enough to cause a problem. Maybe the > > flat spot is making it trip. But 0.1 L is within the hardware's > > tolerance, and if you measure the same patch several times without > > measuring any other patch, you'll see an even bigger difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as > > they are often being updated. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same > > page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep > > them short. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > > membership without notice. > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from > > the membership. > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and > > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO YOU > > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY > > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF > THE "OWNER" AND > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED > OF THE > > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE > INABILITY > > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED > ACCESS TO OR > > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY > > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY > OTHER > > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > > Digital wedding photography > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? > t=ms&k=Digital+wedding+photography&w1=Digital+ > > > wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photograph > y+coll > > > ege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+ > photog > > raphy+course&c=6&%20> > > Learn digital photography > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? > t=ms&k=Learn+digital+photography&w1=Digital+we > > > dding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+ > colleg > > > e&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+ph > otogra > > phy+course&c=6&s=%20> > > Digital photography college > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? > t=ms&k=Digital+photography+college&w1=Digital+ > > > wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photograph > y+coll > > > ege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+ > photog > > raphy+course&c=6&%20> > > Digital photography > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? > t=ms&k=Digital+photography&w1=Digital+wedding+ > > > photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+colleg > e&w4=D > > > igital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photogra > phy+co > > urse&c=6&s=188&.s%20> > > Digital photography web site > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? > t=ms&k=Digital+photography+web+site&w1=Digital > > > +wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photograp > hy+col > > > lege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital > +photo > > graphy+course&c=6%20> > > Digital photography course > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? > t=ms&k=Digital+photography+course&w1=Digital+w > > > edding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography > +colle > > > ge&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+p > hotogr > > aphy+course&c=6&s%20> > > > > _____ > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > > * Visit your group " DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> " on > the web. > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com? > subject=Uns > > ubscribe> > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
Message
Re: Low Dmax on Epson 2200 with K7 inks response
2005-12-03 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.