Digital BW, The Print

On 12/3/05 6:31 PM, "Ronald Baker" <rbaker36@...> typed:

> Thanks for all the input it sounds like the 2200 is a better machine.
> Ron
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Altaf Bhimji" <altafb@...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 7:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 vs 1280
> 

>huge snippet< 

How about anybody how the black and white results from the normal Epson inks
in a 2400 or 4800...

And how they'd compare to putting carbon or one of the better Quadtone kit
options in a plain vanilla archaic 2200?

I bet the 2200 might "win" but thought others might have found out
otherwise.



Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/