Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 vs. 2400 (Qimage challenge)

2005-12-09 by Patrick Carr

David Keenan wrote:

> > I have read of all of the advantages of Qimage especially related
> to resizing of images. But to be honest it's never been really clear
> what it is actually doing for me in the way of improving my printed
> images. (Recently my experience had it unexpectedly reducing the size
> of a 5x7 image printed within a 8.5x11 page for some unknown reason.)
> >
> > I used Qimage basically because of the hype and my faith that it is
> doing what everyone says it does.
> >
> > But I cannot say for certainty that I have ever SEEN a visual
> difference in prints that I have made.


David;
More anecdotal information:
I was curious too, so when a client asked me to enlarge a very small image
(8 x 10 at around 180 ppi) to fit my largest sheet size (35 x 47), I thought
this a good test. I printed a detail using PS Bicubic, and Qimage Pyramid.
The Qimage sample was the better image . . . much better. Less fringe, fewer
artifacts. A much bigger difference than I would have thought.

-PC


Carr Imaging
patcarr@...
www.patrickcarrimaging.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.