David Keenan wrote: > > I have read of all of the advantages of Qimage especially related > to resizing of images. But to be honest it's never been really clear > what it is actually doing for me in the way of improving my printed > images. (Recently my experience had it unexpectedly reducing the size > of a 5x7 image printed within a 8.5x11 page for some unknown reason.) > > > > I used Qimage basically because of the hype and my faith that it is > doing what everyone says it does. > > > > But I cannot say for certainty that I have ever SEEN a visual > difference in prints that I have made. David; More anecdotal information: I was curious too, so when a client asked me to enlarge a very small image (8 x 10 at around 180 ppi) to fit my largest sheet size (35 x 47), I thought this a good test. I printed a detail using PS Bicubic, and Qimage Pyramid. The Qimage sample was the better image . . . much better. Less fringe, fewer artifacts. A much bigger difference than I would have thought. -PC Carr Imaging patcarr@... www.patrickcarrimaging.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 vs. 2400 (Qimage challenge)
2005-12-09 by Patrick Carr
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.