>I was curious too, so when a client asked me to enlarge a very small image >(8 x 10 at around 180 ppi) to fit my largest sheet size (35 x 47), I thought >this a good test. I printed a detail using PS Bicubic, and Qimage Pyramid. >The Qimage sample was the better image . . . much better. Less fringe, fewer >artifacts. A much bigger difference than I would have thought. I think I figured out my situation with the assistance of a forum member in The Netherlands. I'm not doing any upsizing. I am printing a high resolution image. That is what I was missing. Dave. -- David Keenan, ausdlk@swbell.net on 12/10/2005
Message
Re: 2200 vs. 2400 (Qimage challenge)
2005-12-10 by David Keenan