Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-11 by lours51

Hi , I also agree with you, some DSLR take good photographs for sure 
of course, these are pro equipment, that's the only "ins" they offer, 
and the "cons" are too many for me. 
If I was a pro I would probably be digital already, snap, send your 
files, that's it. I guess for many professionnals as soon as it is 
sold, many pictures are thrown or at least it is passed, they are 
just interested in the next one. In that respect it is a consumer 
product attitude and digital fulfill this aspect perfectly. I am not 
sure they had the same attitude before when using film.

Michel



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Altaf Bhimji 
<altafb@m...> wrote:
>
> 
> hi, I agree with you in many respects regarding film - and i'm not  
> digital camera user (just considering the possiblity, and so am in  
> the research phase).
> 
> But I don't think that the DSLR cameras are necessarily just 
consumer  
> snapshot cameras --- they do take really good photographs, 
including  
> black and whites (i.e. with conversion software etc.) - so, as 
long  
> you can take really good photographs with your camera, it is not  
> obsolete (no matter how much anyone sneers at your camera) However, 
I  
> do agree with you regarding price, and the question about how 
digis  
> are filled up with electronics, and are complex machines.
> 
> On the other hand... complexity is relative...
> 
> Altaf
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.