Hi , I also agree with you, some DSLR take good photographs for sure of course, these are pro equipment, that's the only "ins" they offer, and the "cons" are too many for me. If I was a pro I would probably be digital already, snap, send your files, that's it. I guess for many professionnals as soon as it is sold, many pictures are thrown or at least it is passed, they are just interested in the next one. In that respect it is a consumer product attitude and digital fulfill this aspect perfectly. I am not sure they had the same attitude before when using film. Michel --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Altaf Bhimji <altafb@m...> wrote: > > > hi, I agree with you in many respects regarding film - and i'm not > digital camera user (just considering the possiblity, and so am in > the research phase). > > But I don't think that the DSLR cameras are necessarily just consumer > snapshot cameras --- they do take really good photographs, including > black and whites (i.e. with conversion software etc.) - so, as long > you can take really good photographs with your camera, it is not > obsolete (no matter how much anyone sneers at your camera) However, I > do agree with you regarding price, and the question about how digis > are filled up with electronics, and are complex machines. > > On the other hand... complexity is relative... > > Altaf >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film
2005-12-11 by lours51
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.