Peter's experience indicates exceptionally bad processing and/or storage, and or profoundly bad personal luck. I have a collection of 35 and 828 film of various types going back to 1939 (my mother's home-processed Anscochrome)...none of it is "deteriorating" though my father's Kodachromes from Korean War are shifting colors (though not his earlier Kodachromes from Panama), as are some of my own Kodachromes (though not my E4) from 1970-75. I also have family negatives going back into the 1800s that are not "deteriorating." I have however seen 8X10 negatives from WWII whose emulsions were bubbling off. IMO one should take good care of one's negatives as long as is feasible, counting on digital storage in the event people in the future think there's a reason to retrieve our wonderful images. Peter Marshall <petermarshall@c...> wrote: > One of my reasons for moving towards digital storage is the rate at > which my analogue negatives are deteriorating. Almost all modern 35mm > negs for example are on tri-acetate base, which is not stable.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film
2005-12-12 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.