Sorry if I missed something but I have a question. Are you saying that if you go into the "Ink Limit" dialogue in IP that it doesn't work or that it refers to some else? Wendel > > Total agreement! I'd even go further than that. IP uses a "one size > fits all" approach that hard codes ink limits and linearization to > the inkset, so you get one choice, period. If that works for your > paper, great. If not, too bad. Since papers can vary quite a bit > from one to the other, this approach is destined to give mediocre > results on many papers. > > For that reason, the Epson driver usually gives better Dmax, > saturation and color gamut than IP, because at least you have a > choice of paper settings, ink density slider, etc., which allow your > to change the amount of ink hitting the sheet I have no problem > regularly blowing IP off the map with the Epson driver and custom > profiles. > > IP is simple, easy, and has some nice layout capabilities, and > gives "pleasing" color out of the box, but falls short of its > claims. My copy is never used any more. I tried to make it sing for > a year, but it's tone deaf. > > Lou
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Phatte Black
2005-12-13 by Wendel White
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.