Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-13 by Clayton Price

Hi Peter -
I read the Kodak "Vinegar Syndrome" paper on Tri- Acetate film, and   
they don't emphasize enough, the word WATER. If negatives are stored in  
a dry
atmosphere, they will not degrade very much over time. And having come  
to this work from an early background and interest in chemistry (since  
the 7th grade, believe it or not <g>), I am virtually certain that you  
are incorrect in some of your postulates.

First, you are talking simultaneously (in the same sentence), about  
film, presumable B&W, and color slides. They are two totally different  
animals!
Film must be washed completely, with all traces of hypo, hypo  
eliminator, and any other chemistry - totally gone. Traces of chemistry  
on film of any substrate will cause staining and/or bleaching over  
time. I suppose those traces might  protect against some kinds of mold  
(because of their altered pH),
but it wouldn't do much good with a  bleached out negative, caused by  
incomplete washing.

Secondly, about color slides of all sorts. Virtually all the colors in  
transparency films, Kodachrome included, are organic dyes, which are  
susceptible
to molds.  But what is common to all molds, is moisture.  Even color  
transparencies, when stored in low humidity, can have remarkable  
storage lives.
True, controlled humidity, as most museums have, is expensive, and on a  
personal note, I lived in Arizona as a kid, and all my B&W negatives  
are still intact, even though they've been with me for 40 years in NYC.  
But I've picked the driest, darkest spot in my studio for storage,  
using an antique oak storage cabinet (which may not be the best,  
because of out-gasses), but  because wood has a tendency to absorb and  
release moisture. The negatives within are in archival sleeves) have  
remained unchanged.   If you doubt this last statement, you might read  
of why Stradivari stored his violins clipped to a clothes line  
stretched inside his second floor workshop in a part of Italy which has  
high humidity in the summer and is dry in winter. They never cracked or  
got moldy, but of course he washed all the hypo out, then used  
distilled water for the final rinse :-)

All that said, I'm in a never-ending process of scanning my best work  
dating back to the 1950's, mostly because for my interpretation, I like  
the digital rendition of many black & white prints better than the  
silver versions. That's especially true with the last few years'  
progress in the process.
Regards,

Clay Price

>  Peter Marshall wrote:
> ...Film, especially if washed well, is a very attractive substrate for
> moulds etc. I think fixer and other chemicals in low concentration are
> likely to offer some protection, although of course fixer will react
> with the image to give silver sulphide. Many if not most of my
> trade-processed slides are suffering irreversible mould damage, and  
> also
> quite a lot I processed myself....

>   Kodak paper on  Vinegar Syndrome:
> http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/technical/vinegar.jhtml? 
> id=0.1.4.11.12.4&lc=en
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.