Peter Marshall wrote:
> Costs are for humidity and temperature control, not the filing sheets.
> If you really want long lifetimes, add in the inert gas!
>
> Almost from the start I went in for archival processing. I normally
> used hypo clear and washed films for twice the manufacturers recommended
> times and made sure I had frequent changes of water. The negs are all in
> archival filing sheets except for some early work in glassine, which I
> think is also reasonably archival. But I live in an area noted for
> humidity, which is my particular problem. Also that I'd need a larger
> house for really archival storage.
The "squatted" houses I used to live in when most of my B&W
negs were made were damp as well. Though I remember a visit to
London in 1968 that told me that there are places where it is
even more damp (mainly due to substandard heating). Anyway,
around that time I adopted the formaline (formaldehyde) bath
at the very end of negative development. Hardens the emulsion
so less scratches and less fungi.
--
Ernst Dinkla
www.pigment-print.com
( unvollendet )Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film
2005-12-14 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.