Marc, I currently use a 4800 and previously used the 2200. I think the main difference in quality with the new printers (inks) is the lack of bronzing and metamerism on glossy papers. I could never get what I considered to be really great results with the 2200 (for B&W). With the 4800, it has become almost effortless. The ABW driver in the Epson software does, in my opinion, an excellent job. The B&W prints are completely neutral, absolutely no metamerism, and the bronzing is all but eliminated. I've heard some folks say that on matte papers, the difference is not all that much. However, I think one reason a lot of fine art photo printers chose to use matte papers in the first place was the poor quality obtained on glossy papers with previous inkjets. That is really no longer the case, and I think you'll see a lot of photographers going back to the more "traditional" look of the glossier papers. I know I have, and my clients have responded very well. Again, this is all very much my opinion and I'm sure there are many others who disagree, however, hope it helps. Ben
Message
Re: Eps 2400 vs 4000- Any B&W image quality differences?
2005-12-18 by bghess_sp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.