Ernst, I do think all or some of the interpolations available from Qimage are fractal interpolations (not the Genuine Fractals product, of course, just different spins on the shared fractals math). Correct me if I'm wrong. Two of Qimage's interpolation choices seem superior to my vintage Genuine Fractals. But Qimage's interps don't seem as effective as CS2's interp, also a fractals math exercise(IMO etc etc). I don't see a reason for Qimage, except for its convenient production efficiencies, and I do think there's a price to be paid sometimes...it's not the universal solution that its enthusiasts often assert. Fractal interpolation has been around for a long time, is pervasive, not unique to one software brand. John Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@c...> wrote: > > djon43 wrote: > > > ...except for the fractals alternatives, it seems to me to add nothing > > positive beyond convenience... > > There's no fractal extrapolation in Qimage. > > Ernst > > > -- > Ernst Dinkla > > > www.pigment-print.com > ( unvollendet ) >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning B&W negative in Vuesan - what grayspace to assume?
2005-12-20 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.