Camera size is a big deal for me. I shoot a couple of M6TTL's alongside a D70. Nothing like an M6 in a tiny bag with a set of primes, or even no bag just slung over the shoulder with a 2nd roll of film in the pocket. The D70 with the 12-24 and a few primes is a large heavy kit by comparison. But we already have the Epson/Cosina digital RF and next year should bring Leica's digital M offering. Zeiss is another hopeful. Presuming the digital camera market develops in a similar manner to the PC/consumer computing market, I think we'll see more digi RF's, upscale Contax T3 style digi P&S's and other various niche camera designs. The digital guts of the camera will become comiditized (like CPU's and chipsets in the PC market), allowing more R&D and manufacuring resources to devote to other aspects of camera design. Manufacturers will design for higher margin niches in search of profits in a competitive and more stable market, or as "marquee" cameras to enforce brand identity. At least we can hope so :-) Tom Baker wrote: > > There may be more range finder professional cameras. But, in > reality, there probably isn't enough demand to make it economicaly viable. > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film
2005-12-22 by Scott McLoughlin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.