Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital vs. Film: the ANSWER

2005-12-22 by BKPhoto@aol.com

Scott-

Those are all good and interesting questions. Our approach to teaching 
photography now is to encourage students to think inclusively. We try 
to keep as much of the dialogue focused on the image as possible, and 
want students to elect either the digital or wet darkroom because 
that's the best method or choice for the image(s) they want to make.

The real issue for us is that we have to be as competent in teaching 
digital imaging and the digital darkroom as we've been with film-based 
photography and the wet darkroom. This requires faculty competency, 
good facilities, the right hardware and software, support staff and 
more. The effort and expense are substantial.

But it does work and we're beginning to see young photographers embrace 
this "dual competancy" idea. Right now, many of our students are 
electing to shoot film, scan, and print with ink on paper. I think this 
works well for them because they can work with a large format or medium 
format camera, shooting film, but use the enhanced control made 
possible by processing images in Photoshop and printing with ink. Even 
though many are purchasing D-SLR's, they still want to shoot 
Hasselblads and view cameras because we spend a lot of time talking 
about the "psychology of the moment"--especially important when working 
with or shooting people--and how that moment is affected by one's 
camera choice.

It's truly a great time to be a photographer. The only real drawbacks 
are cost and time.

Bill Kennedy
Austin, Texas

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:56:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Digital vs. Film: the ANSWER

   Your description of students shooting LF, made me wonder something.

I'm not so interested in the progress of digital in the "pro" and
"consumer"
markets. Understandable.  And reasonably well described and report on.

But what's the medium of choice for "fine art" photographers, whether
"pro" or "serious amateur?"   Or rather, why are these folks going 
digital
or sticking with film (or both, which I suspect is common with this
demographic)?  How does color or B&W orientation effect the choice
of medium?  Who is printing digitally or sticking with the darkroom?

Scott


BKPhoto@... wrote:

> Guys-
>
>   I can tell you that college and university students, at least those
> I've talked with over the past two years, are embracing large format
> film-based photography with a real passion. I think this is, in part, 
a
> reaction to digital. It also speaks to their attachment for working in
> the wet darkroom. Lastly, the internet has made it possible for people
> interested in alternative processes to communicate on a level unheard
> of before.
>
>   Marshall McLuhan understood this phenomena perfectly: old 
technologies
> never die, they become art forms.
>
>




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources 
as they
are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this 
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
keep them
short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. 
Hostile,
aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership 
without
notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed 
from the
membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
guidelines,
and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and 
Moderators. See
"Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
PRINT YAHOO!
GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF
DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY 
DIRECT,
INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, 
INCLUDING BUT
NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR 
OTHER
INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, 
THE
PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH 
DAMAGES),
RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
PRINT
YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR 
TRANSMISSIONS OR
DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE
PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE
PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

Yahoo! Groups Links

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.