Scott- Those are all good and interesting questions. Our approach to teaching photography now is to encourage students to think inclusively. We try to keep as much of the dialogue focused on the image as possible, and want students to elect either the digital or wet darkroom because that's the best method or choice for the image(s) they want to make. The real issue for us is that we have to be as competent in teaching digital imaging and the digital darkroom as we've been with film-based photography and the wet darkroom. This requires faculty competency, good facilities, the right hardware and software, support staff and more. The effort and expense are substantial. But it does work and we're beginning to see young photographers embrace this "dual competancy" idea. Right now, many of our students are electing to shoot film, scan, and print with ink on paper. I think this works well for them because they can work with a large format or medium format camera, shooting film, but use the enhanced control made possible by processing images in Photoshop and printing with ink. Even though many are purchasing D-SLR's, they still want to shoot Hasselblads and view cameras because we spend a lot of time talking about the "psychology of the moment"--especially important when working with or shooting people--and how that moment is affected by one's camera choice. It's truly a great time to be a photographer. The only real drawbacks are cost and time. Bill Kennedy Austin, Texas -----Original Message----- From: Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:56:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Digital vs. Film: the ANSWER Your description of students shooting LF, made me wonder something. I'm not so interested in the progress of digital in the "pro" and "consumer" markets. Understandable. And reasonably well described and report on. But what's the medium of choice for "fine art" photographers, whether "pro" or "serious amateur?" Or rather, why are these folks going digital or sticking with film (or both, which I suspect is common with this demographic)? How does color or B&W orientation effect the choice of medium? Who is printing digitally or sticking with the darkroom? Scott BKPhoto@... wrote: > Guys- > > I can tell you that college and university students, at least those > I've talked with over the past two years, are embracing large format > film-based photography with a real passion. I think this is, in part, a > reaction to digital. It also speaks to their attachment for working in > the wet darkroom. Lastly, the internet has made it possible for people > interested in alternative processes to communicate on a level unheard > of before. > > Marshall McLuhan understood this phenomena perfectly: old technologies > never die, they become art forms. > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital vs. Film: the ANSWER
2005-12-22 by BKPhoto@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.