Where do you see that the samples are simulated? The page specifically says the samples are NOT simulated: http://www.scanhancer.com/index.php?art=10&men=10 I used the Scanhancer while I hade the Microtek Artixscan 120tf. It worked really well on some films, on other films I could see no difference. If I remember correctly tmx is one of the films where the Scanhancer had no effect. In general the Scanhancer works well for films like Velvia that give you pepper grain which shows up as black spots on the scan, or white spots in the case of negatives. I remember it worked great for Delta 100 which had exactly this problem. Here's a sample I made from some Kodak PPN color negative scans: http://daniel.staver.no/img/scanhancer01.jpg -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no > Reading the "scanhancer" page does not inspire confidence. > The Minolta sample is also, perhaps not by coincidence, a > "simulated" comparison. (Hmm, I wonder why they had to > "simulate" a comparison?)
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Diffusion sheet in scanner (was Re: 40" Print, How many Megapixels?)
2005-12-23 by Daniel Staver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.