Daniel, > Where do you see that the samples are simulated? The Minolta page with respect to their version of this. > The page specifically says > the samples are NOT simulated: > http://www.scanhancer.com/index.php?art=10&men=10 I had not seen this page. These are the types of results I expected, but did not see. > > I used the Scanhancer while I hade the Microtek Artixscan 120tf. It worked > really well on some films, on other films I could see no difference. If I > remember correctly tmx is one of the films where the Scanhancer had no > effect. I suspect that is a major part of the problem. I was just using TMX. I wonder what it'd do with some of the older technology B&W films. I might test Agfa 25 (which I have on hand), although Efke 25 would be the currently available film of interest that it might have more impact on. > ... I remember it worked great for Delta 100 which had > exactly this problem. That's not a bad film to start with either. It looks like the idea may warrant more experimenting -- with different films. Thanks for the information. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Diffusion sheet in scanner (was Re: 40" Print, How many Megapixels?)
2005-12-23 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.