> Paul, ... do I understand you to say that the 1280 with MIS
> color pigment inks produces results comparable to those with the 2400
> and Epson inks? Color and permanence?
No, I deal with the B&W inks -- UT2, for example, on the 1280. I use MIS
color pigments, but have not compared them to the 2400 with respect to gamut
and lightfastness (aside from a B&W print made with the 2400 and MIS 2400
("K4") inks). Of course, no 1280 with color inks can touch the 2400 or 1280
with UT2 with respect to B&W output. Whether a 1280 with MIS color pigments
can make a color print equal to a 2400 color print is not an issue I've
addressed or explored.
> I've been using 2 1280s, one for B&W, one for color. I'm considering
> replacing the latter with a 2400 but if I read you correctly, this
> would be unnecessary.
I theory the 2400's gray inks would provide better neutral tones within
color images. How important this is in real world printing is not an issue
I've looked into.
Paul
www.PaulRoark.comMessage
RE: [Digital BW] Epson R2400 vs 1280 w/ MIS inks
2005-12-29 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.