Looks to me that's where we're heading...and that is the environment with the most rapid development and "progress"... Maintaining the closed market is a dead end compared to what that will achieve. IMHO <g> tom --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "lyonscox" <lyonscox@m...> wrote: > Reading the posts about parceling out the parts of the system made me > think of cameras, especially models of the 60's. You choose a Nikon > because you can drop it, a Canon because it leads innovation, an > Olympus because of compact size, etc. Most when they came out meant > you had to buy that producers lens and with few complaints. In > extreme cases you might chose a Nikon over a Canon because of a 28mm > vs. a 35mm shift tilt lens. > > But even in the 60's there were lens converters for Leica to Canon, > Nikon, whatever. Cheapie lens accessories to telephoto or wide- > angle. The Majors certainly didn't 'support' your kenko adapter so > you could use a Tominon lens. > > The current software/ink platform doesn't seem any different to me. > There's either brand compatibility/loyalty or there is thrifty and > creative (if not make-shift) adaptability. > > 2 cents (& 175 words ;-) > > Cleavis
Message
Re: Supplier criticisms and Monoploies
2002-01-05 by tomoc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.