Thanks Greg, that's interesting information. I've been having my colour profiles made by Dry Creek and doing my own B&W ones with a densitometer, but keep thinking about a spectrophotometer like the Eye-One, mainly because of its usefulness beyond just printer profiling. What sort of an instrument is the PrintFixPro device? Best, Helen --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Greg" <dfaprinting@y...> wrote: > > The colorimeter will not be as accurate. > > It may be close, as the old system that was exactly like this was > close, but not as accurate. Owning many different tools (hardware and > software and including the old Colorvision system), I can tell you > that a real spectrophotometer is the best way to go. Short of that, I > would say you might consider having someone build your profiles for > you. The i1 Photo and Xrite Pulse are both very good, and to journey > above that is more than another $2000 to $4000 for the software > (Gretag PMP starts at around $2000 plus you need a spectro). I'm > currently using Xrite's Monaco Profiler Platinum, or Heidelberg > Printopen with either an i1 or Xrite DTP20UV (Pulse spectro), and all > I can tell you is that they work well. Profiler gives a bigger > target, but they both produce excellent results. I haven't tried the > Pulse software, and may never try it (since I have Profiler). It was > simply only another $50 for the full Pulse system, with the Optix XR2 > for the monitor, over the price of the spectro alone. I would > recommend that you throw another $500+ at your colormanagement > solutions if you definitely want to do the profiles yourself. If the > Printfix Pro software is worth having, I would still recomend a real > spectrophotometer to use with it, and you might want to get the UV > filtered version of that spectro. >
Message
Re: PrintFixPro, was Colorvision vs. Gretag
2006-01-11 by helen_bach2003
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.