--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody" <moodymz3@y...> wrote: > > They call it a spectro device, but it uses LEDs; so who knows what it really > is. I guess there are two units as well; the pro version has a different > device that also uses LEDs. It does not sound like something that measures > the spectrum every 10nm though. Maybe koloshor has some thoughts on this. > It probably does not follow the 45/0 degree standard either, but if it makes > great profiles who cares? > I'll tell you what I know of the old device. It was a ColorSavvy ColorMouse CM2C. The CM2C uses many LEDs to generate combinations of different color light, in a 45/0 pattern, but the light rotates around the center as it changes from one color to the next. There were two "banks" of opposed LEDs, so each bank would rotate through 180 degrees. There was somewhere between 6 and 10 combinations of colors coming out of the device, so it definitely did not sample every 10nm. What I think it did was to sample a couple blue, a green, and a couple red illuminations, and form a Lab value from that combination. If you really need to know, I might be able to dig it out and count. And I'm pretty sure that the new device isn't much different, except that now it has a USB connection, and gets power from the USB. It also looks like it is bigger and bulkier, and they claim it is faster than before. The more important things come out when you read the description on their web site! See my comments here: (I'm too lazy to type them again) http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1003&message=16546764 When I used the CM2C with ProfilerPro (2.x and 3.0), it was ugly! When I used the CM2C with Monaco Profiler 4.5, I got good results on paper with no OBA. Paper with OBA had a yellow cast to the prints. When I went to using an Xrite DTP22 Digital Swatchbook with Profiler, I got better results(still problems with OBA). When I went to using an i1 spectro with Profiler, I got different results from the DTP22 (again still problems with OBA). When I went to Printopen, I could cancel the OBA in the software. Since I've upgraded to Profiler 4.8, I've been using a UV filtered spectro, so no problems with OBA with any software. Most of the above was making CMYK profiles for my RIP, maybe the ProfilerPro software worked better with RGB, maybe... If you want to read my commennts about the Colorvision Spectro suite, do a search on DPReview for "colorvision spectro suite"
Message
[Digital BW] Re: PrintFixPro, was Colorvision vs. Gretag
2006-01-11 by Greg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.