"Chris Hargens" <chargens@s...> wrote: > > I'm currently printing BW with my 2200 using QTR with the UC inkset > (matte black). I'm thinking about switching to the 2400 to get better > blacks and (hopefully) dotless highlights, along with the capacity to > print on glossy papers. But before I commit myself I want to > investigate other options. Perhaps the simplest thing to do is use MIS Eboni in the MK slot alongside the UC inkset -- which is what I do. I've used these options: EZN/W on C86 Black Only on 2200 ImagePrint UC/2200 +/- Eboni I find the Eboni an improvement over Epson's MK. Each of the different options give a different "look" to the print. The black only option with MIS Eboni gives a great "punch" to the print but there is a noticible graininess if you look closely. I highly recommend the EZN and/or UT7 (and presumably the K7) approach if you aren't also printing color. I also have a 4800 and am very pleased (thrilled) with it for glossy photos but I'd say that for someone who already has a 2200 there is very little noticible advantage in moving to a 2400/4800 etc. if you are printing with matte papers. Think about adding the 2400 for glossy purposes -- in which case you do get terrific dmax, but keep the 2200 for matte papers. Jonathan
Message
Re: 2200 to 2400 or?
2006-01-14 by Jonathan Borden
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.