Thanks for the ideas. I currently print almost exclusively on matte paper. That may change if the new Crane Silver Rag paper, along with others that may follow, opens up the possibility of printing on a glossy/semigloss paper that doesn't have that plastic feel. I may give eboni a try again. As for smoother prints, I think another way would be to use UT7's eboni, custom light black, dark gray, and light gray, and print warm tone prints using QTR. Too bad MIS hasn't come up with a k7 inkset that utilizes eboni, for good blacks, and achieves warms and cools through paper choice rather than toning curves. Chris Hargens --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jonathan Borden" <borden_jonathan@y...> wrote: > > Perhaps the simplest thing to do is use MIS Eboni in the MK slot alongside the UC inkset > -- which is what I do. > > I've used these options: > EZN/W on C86 > Black Only on 2200 > ImagePrint UC/2200 +/- Eboni > > I find the Eboni an improvement over Epson's MK. Each of the different options give a > different "look" to the print. The black only option with MIS Eboni gives a great "punch" to > the print but there is a noticible graininess if you look closely. I highly recommend the EZN > and/or UT7 (and presumably the K7) approach if you aren't also printing color. > > I also have a 4800 and am very pleased (thrilled) with it for glossy photos but I'd say that > for someone who already has a 2200 there is very little noticible advantage in moving to a > 2400/4800 etc. if you are printing with matte papers. > > Think about adding the 2400 for glossy purposes -- in which case you do get terrific > dmax, but keep the 2200 for matte papers. > > Jonathan >
Message
Re: 2200 to 2400 or?
2006-01-14 by Chris Hargens
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.