John,
I found that running the K3/2200 B&W prints through my R800 and laying
down Epson glop actually decreased the D-Max slightly - by an average
of 0.1 - and also produced occasional blemishes that had the appearance
of minute light-coloured blisters. I didn't investigate further, mainly
because of the lowering of D-Max.
I'm a bit baffled by the 822/824 thing, and we have had slightly
different stories from Image Specialists ("824 has a little more gloss
and it has replaced 822") and Weink ("IS only list 822 as Krystal
Topkote. 824 is replacement glop.")
The bottle of 822 is marked as both Krystal Topkote and clear base. At
the rate we're using it, the 500 ml won't last long so I'll try some
824 in a while. If anything, I'd like a bit more gloss.
Best,
Helen
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody"
<moodymz3@y...> wrote:
>
> Helen,
> Thanks for the progress reports.
> Do you have an opinion as to why the R800/glop did not work like the
WJ822?
> What was the reason for giving up on it?
> If Greg is right, and WJ824 _is_ glop, I wonder if you would have a
> different result with it in the 2200, and different than your current
WJ822
> batch?
>
> Best regards,
> John MoodyMessage
[Digital BW] Re: Krystal Topkote
2006-01-17 by helen_bach2003
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.