Back on topic, below is the email I just sent to Crane's with my initial impressions of Silver Rag printed on my Epson 98000 w. Pghhoto Black: "I have just printed some Silver Rag yesterday on my Epson 9800 with Photo Black ink and the prints look spectacular. I obviously need to consider them some more (I'm going to look at the prints again today after they're fully dried), but my initial reaction is that this paper is fabulous. My only concerns are that (a) it's a bit too glossy and (b) it's a bit too textured. Put together, the high gloss and texture create obtrusive reflectivity when the print is viewed at any angle other than flat on a table or flat against a wall. In other words, if the paper is tilted at all (and I don't mean severely titled -- just any position that's not perfectly flat), or if the light is coming at the paper from an oblique angle, the glossiness/reflectivity becomes obtrusive and obscures the details. So, my initial gut reaction is to suggest that Crane cut the current "gloss" (currently more like an RC darkroom paper) down to a "sheen" (more like a air-dried fiber darkroom print) and minimize the texture a bit. (I don't think the texture should be eliminated, however -- the texture gives this paper a unique appearance. But to truly be closer to an air-dried fiber print, the textured should be lessened somewhat). Keep in mind, though, that the image I was printing for the samples was a B&W portrait will large areas of black (i.e., a head-and-shoulders portrait against a black background), so I imagine that that may have something to do with the obtrusive gloss when viewed in any position other than perfectly flat. If the "obtrusive reflectivity when hit by oblique light" issue can be minimized, Silver Rag will quickly become my primary paper." (I should add that even if the paper is released as-is, I will still probably use it quite a bit)).
Message
Re: Museo Silver Rag impressions
2006-01-19 by chipcarterdc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.