Digital BW, The Print

John wrote:


>   You are right in asking whether or not I will be permitted to talk about everything, the answer is I am restricted about some things under NDA's as are our original beta testers, although some of them are sailing close to the wind in that direction and I would urge them to think carefully as I also have to do in these circumstances.
>    
>   I am prepared to discuss the infusion technology in general principals as we have now international patents granted so the principles are a matter of public record, I can also discuss the range of Papers Films and Fabrics and interior Design Products which will be available during this year, and how they differ from the conventional products. 
>    
>   I can't discuss who is using the technology because of the NDA's, and also as a matter of business prudence, and the fact that there are several more international patent applications in hand. 
>    
>   I can't discuss details about the inks or who is licencing them, just generalities and what the advantages will be when used with the Infusion technology substrates and the PocketRIP.
>    
>   I can write a general statement or answer questions, 
>    
>   What I will not do is to get into technology arguments or answering certain vested interests questions about how we make the products.
>    
>   Or I can continue answering the many off group questions that are sent to me direct, on a direct one to one basis, and yours would be welcome.


I'm not Greg but a general statement would be nice.  What 
infused papers there will be. What the compatibility is and 
what the advantages are with the licensed inks. What the 
compatibility of the licensed inks is with the papers that are 
now used by early adopters. I don't think that the list 
members on this list and the wide format list would object to 
any first hand information they can get.

Ernst

                    --
           Ernst Dinkla


www.pigment-print.com
(         unvollendet         )