Digital BW, The Print

"I now see why Livick removed all his testing..."

Yes, and it's a shame.

Also, according to Livick, glas, of any type, only give about an 
additional 10% protection. And I think that was with the "museum" type 
glass.

Scott




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Greg" 
<dfaprinting@y...> wrote:
>
> Well, I'm not going to get into this more other than to say that 
> pending the outcome of the emails to Ink Village, my spectro has been 
> enlisted to do the measuring.
> 
> If Ink Village want the prints, then they should get them. If not 
> I'll measure and post when I receive them. As far as the testing 
> goes, they were stacked up against the Epson dye and pigment inks. 
> For a good comparison, the amount of light would be nice, but not 
> really needed since it is a relatively general comparison between the 
> Epson dye and Epson pigment inks. You should also remember that these 
> were done behind double pane glass, I bet the amount of UV that gets 
> through is pretty low.
> 
> I now see why Livick removed all his testing...
>