(I quickly reviewing posts, I'm not sure if this one was answered, if so, sorry for the redundancy.) > ...I'm using a 1280 with MIS UT2 inks. ... > I printed the test image on Epson Enhanced Matte. > I converted the image to RGB and applied Paul's > neutral curve for EEM. When the image was printed all steps were > distinguishable [the] black was black but it seemed that the preceding > grey values were lighter than should be. ... I'm moving all my workflows to the ICC method so that people can more easily linearize their systems and so that the prints will match the monitors better. I'll have some 1280 ICCs posted soon. I (and many others doing B&W) used custom dot gain curves to match the monitor to the print in the past. I understand this is more than most want to mess with. Printers differ slightly from each other -- as do all paper and (more so) inkset batches. So, doing custom curves is the best way. I tweak my curves as needed, but, again, I understand most don't want to mess with this. The ICC method with Roy Harrington's "Create ICC" will allow everyone with a decent scanner to linearize their systems. See http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Making_B-W_ICCs.htm As another interim approach, consider changing your gray working space to Dot gain 20%. The monitor might match the print better. (Change the space before opening the file or convert the file to this space.) Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Test Image
2006-01-30 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.