> > And we might add, Wilhelm missed this completely. Those inks went out to > the marketplace with his stamp of approval. Hundred year life, I think > he said. I belive that is wrong. Wil wasn't working closely with Epson at that time. Those were the days when he was testing everything, Lyson, Media Street, Iris, anything. A lot of Epson's papers he gave horrible ratings to at that time, and the dye inks like the 1200. His figures for the 1270 inks on Premium Glossy was 29 years I belive which is the figure for 450 lux illumination with those dye/hybred inks. Yes, he missed the ozone problem from airconditioners but look, he started out testing silver materials and this was something that didn't suffer from it. None of us knew either until we either experience it or read his comments. If we want to blame somebody for that we blame Epson. It was their baby at that point. I have to give credit to Lyson though. They started selling their print protective spray in the very beginning even with the papers they were repackaging from Hahnemuhle. I think they must have known more about the airborne contaminants. The Premium Glossy type paper was new then. The inksets were new then. Everything was new then. No one knew anything, especially Epson. It wasn't in use for very long before this was revealed, I think less than a year. I remeber becasue I stared with the Epson 700, then the 1200, the the 1270, the 10K, etc. The inks were changing even faster then. I'll tell you though compared to the other junk on the market even now with innovative sounding names, those inks perform wonderfully for certain purposes. And HP still doen't have an answer to anything that versatile, ozone or not. John
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Lux and Fading
2006-01-31 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.