Hello Greg; Lovely bunch of numbers I'm sure; you wouldn't care to sumarize it for us non-techie dunderheads, would you? Steve Karafyllakis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Greg" <dfaprinting@y...> wrote: > > OK, nobody kill me, I'm only the guy with the spectro. I just > finished measuring all the papers, and zipped it up. For those that > care... You will get Lab, spectral, and status T densitometric > measuresments (two files for each paper). Each paper is divided into > the reference print, then the test (faded) print in the same file (I > was lazy). Please take a moment to notice that there is a paper white > measurement added. Also notice how the paper white has changed on the > EEM paper (as well as maybe some others). > > Abbreviations shoud be obvious, but here are some that I can remember: > > HPRS - Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin > EPG - Epson Photo Glossy > EPSG - semi gloss > EEM - Epson Enhanced Matte > Albrecht - Hahnemuhle Albrecht Durer > > And again, if you don't like the way the test was done, or don't like > the results, or really anything else that might be even closely > related to this, please don't take it out on me, I'm just the guy > that was willing to measure it. Sorry no cool graphs, the changes > weren't pronounced enough yet to make a real good visual impact. If > there was more fading, then I might have made some 2D ab graphs or > maybe even some Lab graphs to show how much they had changed. If you > want something that will show a big change, try graphing the spectral > values for several of the "colors", you might get some info that a > Lab value would not show (especially paper white for EEM). Spectral > values start at 400nm. > > So with all that said, here you go: > http://www.dfaprinting.com/nanotest.zip > > I'll leave it there for a while (a couple weeks at the shortest), but > not forever. Enjoy >
Message
Re: Nanochrome short term fade test measurements.
2006-02-01 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.