I am currently saving for an Epson 4800. I can probably make do with a 13" printer but I have been pointing toward the 4800 for two reasons: 1) more precise construction = better prints (maybe) and 2) lower ink costs. With respect to ink costs, I would guess that I'll print 100-150 prints per month at around 11x14 or and perhaps 20-25 at 16x20. I'm not sure whether that makes the savings for 110 or 220ml worth it. And, I don't really know whether the more precise construction of the printer will make a noticeable difference in print quality. I'd love to have comments from users of either the 2400 or the 4800 or both. Thanks, --Gib
Message
2400 vs 4800 Relative Merits
2006-02-01 by Gilbert Robinson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.