Clayton, Thank you for the many contributions you've made to advance digital art printing. I want you to know I support your test methods and have personally seen the quality of the results. Nothing attests more to the validity of what you are doing than the result itself. A few months ago I purchased a 5x7 of your church interior print to serve as an example of what I can do if I get my processes down. That print is absolutely fantastic! I was expecting something nice, but not that nice. Steve has gone past the point of a respectful, intellectual discussion and resorted to sarcasm in an attempt to establish his approach as superior. Anyone receiving that type of response to an honest, open statement can be discouraged and wonder whether its worth the risk to continue making public the results of their work. I hope that thought never crosses your mind! To not be able to benefit from your experience would be a serious loss to the entire printing community. Please keep your posts and website updates coming. They benefit many more people than the few who are irritated by them! Bob --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote: > > Hello Claude, > > >Since I still do personal work in B&W, and as a former "zoner," > >I can appreciate the work of Clayton, with his use of RELATIVE > >rating. Empirical testing of only 2 components, with a VERY useful > >conclusion. One can readily make some informed decisions about > >substantial paper batch investments (financial committment) from a > >guy who can "hang them on the wall,' as opposed to a meter reader. > >To that I say: nice work. > > Thank you. It's nice to have a confirmation from someone who > understands. In my last posts on this issue I struggled to find the > right words to describe the purpose, or need, that the review attempts > to serve, and did not feel I succeeded. It was very frustrating. You > have, in a few concise sentences, nailed it perfectly. > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >
Message
Re: Clayton and Steve
2006-02-02 by Bob Marsolais
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.