Try discussing > exposure, a photographic subject (rather than a printing subject), without > mentioning seconds, aperture and ISO. IT'S EASY... done forever by thousands of fine photographers and print makers. I'm currently reading Edward Weston again. Print exchanges are valuable, but I've not seen examples of photography or printmaking in them that begin to rival Edward Weston's. This means specifically that the data-oriented approach still has a long way to go.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Clayton and Steve
2006-02-02 by djon43