I think this has already been answered, but FWIW - I have the 1800, and I love it. I believe I'm even getting very good B&W prints from it. But if my main interest were B&W, I would have bought the 2400. I think there's general agreement that the 2400 is the better printer for B&W. Its main disadvantage is the diffraction differences one sees when printing on gloss papers (the specular white areas don't get ink coverage, so they look duller than areas which are inked). Many people claim that the diffraction is even a problem when printing with the 1400 on pearl or semi-gloss papers, but I doubt that. If I print on a pearl surface such as Epson Premium Luster, I have to work pretty hard to see that diffraction differential. It's there, but I doubt that anyone would notice it unless they worked at it. So - if your main interest is B&W, get the 2400. If you don't particularly like glossy prints, especially **really** glossy prints, get the 2400. Bill Hansen
Message
Re: Epson 4800 vs. 2400 question
2006-02-04 by wgh2005
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.