Hello Ginny, >I'm not sure how the 200 fits in with your workflow for the 2400 >if you are using the 200 mainly for BO prints. Sorry if I wasn't clear. Because I use an unmanaged workflow (no profiling or color management procedures) with equivalent settings for both printers, I get good WYSIWYG and can send an image to either printer and get very similar results (in terms of density and contrast). So I work up an image doing all proofing with R200/BO on EEM. This reduces ink costs significantly (BO printing is extremely economical because a lot less ink is laid down). Once I'm satisfied with the image it becomes a matter of how I want to do the final print. Whether I want a BO or a K3 print, depending on what paper I use I may or may not need to add an adjustment curve layer to the image. Some papers are different enough from EEM in contrast and/or density to require a curve to make the final print match the proof. This curve is usually quite simple and quick, requiring one or two more proofs on the final paper. Once it's done it's saved with the image for future use. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: Epson 4800 vs. 2400 question
2006-02-06 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.