Ginny, YEP, you are correct. 8.5" width is the max for the R220. But it's a great little printer and so cheap with rebates,promotions, etc. (~$0 to $99) it's easy to own several with different ink set-ups, etc. And with Paul Roarks UT2 inks you can print "quad -tone"[actually 6 black positions with 3 different dilutions as I understand it) or BO. See Paul Roarks site for this info if you're interested. It's a great companion site for Clayton's. I personally like the Warm set which is 100% carbon with Eboni in the K position. --- ginnylady33 <ginnylady33@...> wrote: > Thanks for sharing all this Michael. It is useful > for me to learn. > Am I correct that the R220 limits you to 8X10 > prints? > > Regards > Ginny > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > Michael Vendrell > <mjvendrell2@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- Michael Vendrell <mjvendrell2@...> wrote: > > > > > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:12:34 -0800 (PST) > > > From: Michael Vendrell <mjvendrell2@...> > > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 4800 vs. > 2400 > > > question > > > To: Michael Vendrell <mjvendrell2@...> > > > > > > p.s. BO on the 2200 using either OEM MK (warmer) > or > > > Eboni (more neutral) onto uncoated Arches > Watercolor > > > paper (either hot press [smoother] or cold press > > > [more > > > texture]) produces a very pleasing platinum-like > > > print > > > suitable for some images that do not require > high > > > d-max or high sharpness. This is truly carbon > on > > > cotton and can look wonderful for the right kind > of > > > image. > > > > > > Arches is sized with gelatin but is otherwise > > > uncoated. The company has been around since > 1492, > > > has > > > been makingthe paper more or less the same way > since > > > then, and Arches is more or less the standard > for > > > watercolorists. I have also used it for gum > > > bi-chromate printing and it works very well for > that > > > as well. It is inexpensive relative to coated > papers > > > and there are similar gelatin sized but > otherwise > > > uncoated papers for even less. e.g. Here in St. > > > Paul,MN the local art supply house "Wet Paint" > sells > > > a > > > re-branded watercolor paper from the UK for a > quite > > > competitive price. N.B Watercolor paper sizes > are > > > non-standard for the US market and you would > need a > > > proper paper cutter if you wanted to cut these > to > > > standard US sizes such as 8.5" and 13" widths.) > > > > > > Paul Roark also has some ICC profiles for > printing > > > on > > > Arches with UT2 ink-sets in the R220 - I've been > > > intending to give that approach a try in my R220 > but > > > haven't gotten around to it as yet. If anyone > else > > > has tried that - I would be quite interested in > > > their > > > results. > > > > > > This is one of the only areas in which I can add > to > > > what Clayton has so beautifully put togrther on > his > > > site - a true gem... > > > > > > Michael Vendrell > > > > > > --- Michael Vendrell <mjvendrell2@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Ginny, I agree with Clayton. Your questions > are > > > > good > > > > ones that most of us either want to know or > enjoy > > > > reviewing and adding our $.02 worth... > > > > Michael Vendrell, MD > > > > > > > > --- Clayton Jones <cj@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Ginny, > > > > > > > > > > >I must admit that the one or two BO good > prints > > > I > > > > > got out of my > > > > > >1280 were, indeed, more pleasing to my eye > than > > > > > those made with > > > > > >my 1800. They had a very open, warm toned, > > > > > luminous look on > > > > > >Epson Enhanced Matte. > > > > > > > > > > Yep. In spite of its graininess, BO remains > > > > popular > > > > > with a lot of > > > > > photographers. Over the past few years > there > > > have > > > > > been several > > > > > reports of people showing pairs of identical > > > > images > > > > > printed with BO > > > > > and full ink, to laypersons, who chose the > BO > > > one > > > > > because "it looks > > > > > better". It has fine qualities, you just > have > > > to > > > > > choose which images > > > > > to use it with. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >What printer would be most trouble-free > > > (blockage > > > > > wise) with BO if > > > > > >I wanted to print up to 11X14? > > > > > > > > > > The 2200 is a really fine BO printer. The > only > > > > > thing better (that I > > > > > know of) is the 4000. It has a more random > > > dither > > > > > pattern which > > > > > results in slightly smoother tones. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I must disagree with the person who > > > suggested > > > > > to go do some > > > > > research on your own - your questions are > most > > > > > welcome. It's what > > > > > this forum is all about, so ask all you > want. > > > > There > > > > > are lots of > > > > > silent readers who I'm sure will be > benefitting > > > > from > > > > > these > > > > > discussions, so you are asking for them as > well. > > > > > > > > This forum is not > > > > > just for the convenience of more experienced > > > > users. > > > > > That's my .02 worth. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Clayton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > > > > > > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > > protection around > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: Fwd: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 4800 vs. 2400 question
2006-02-06 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.