--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" > <roy@> wrote: > ... > > I must say the dot size controls sound way too complicated and > unnecessary > .... > > A RIP ought to have all that builtin. Admittedly the variable dot > transitions are > > more complicated than single dot sizes, but again that ought to be > calibrated > > and built into the RIP. > > I guess I'm misleading people. Obvioulsy one needn't get that far > under the hood if they don't want to. Many built-in options are at hand. > I can't help but stress this would only be of interest to a few. > Tyler > I just can't imagine what benefit the user could possibly provide. There's really only one "right" way to do the dots and that should be builtin. But from your first post it sounds like they had some difficulties in past, so I guess they are both improving some of the issues and letting you get around others. Roy
Message
Re: StudioPrint v12 and quads
2006-02-11 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.