In reading an article containing the thoughts of Jon Cone it was mentioned that while matte papers excel in their ability to reproduce tones and depth, none of the non-matte papers receive the ink as well and do not have the same quality. Previously, I had thought that the opposite was true, and that matte papers wouldn't have the depth and tonal range and depth. Do I need to reverse my understanding? In having to choose between inks and papers to achieve depth and tone, are the matte papers superior? Clarence W. Walker, Creative Expression Photography http://www.creativeexpressiononline.com Commercial, fine-art, and stock
Message
Matte versus gloss papers for tone
2006-02-15 by Clarence Walker