Silly question but are you sure you printed on the right side of the paper? > From: alanrew42 <Alan-Rew@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:06:20 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Da Vinci Fibre Gloss Paper > > OK, here are my not-at-all-exciting measurements. Taken with Eye-One > Pro Rev. B on top of a blank sample of the same media. 4 readings > averaged. > > Epson 2100 + UC inks, Photo Black Ink, 'Premium Semiglossy', 2880, NCA > RGB 0,0,0 measures > Lab 13.7, -0.7, -3.8 which is _not_ very black really (an Ilford > Galerie Smooth Gloss profile I made with UC measures 5, 0, -3 with PK). > > My paper white measurements are virtually identical to Steve's: > Lab 96.6, 0.7, -4.6 > > Using all the colours to print an RGB step wedge gives no more shadow > detail than other glossy papers I've used with this ink. This is done > using a profile made with the TC9.18 target; I might try one of the > bigger Atkinson targets some time, but at the moment I'm a bit > underwhelmed with the Da Vinci results using UC ink. > > This is OT for a B&W list, but the colour gamut is no better than > other glossy papers I've profiled, although there is slightly more red > gamut than my current favourite glossy paper. > > The 'almost glossy' look is a bit like the old Epson 'Glossy Paper - > Photo Weight', although that paper is smoother with less texture. > > It looks like K3 inks are needed to get the best out of this paper. > > Regards, > > Alan > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "alanrew42" > <Alan-Rew@...> wrote: >> >> OK, to make it more fun, I'll post them in installments :-)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Da Vinci Fibre Gloss Paper
2006-02-18 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.