Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Museo Max and 1800 or 2400

2006-02-19 by how786

Thanks. I did try one sheet at a time in the rear feeder to no
avail. And, yes, it is really stiff, too!
Howard

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Atherton"
<timatherton@...> wrote:
>
>  
> >   Has anyone used this paper in either a 2400 or 1800? It is the
> >   thickest paper I've ever seen and jammed my 1800 even when the 
> 1800
> >   was set to 'thick' paper.
> >   When I compared the thickness to the VFA, the Max appears at  
> least
> >   50% thicker! I am doubting Crane's quality control as they list 
> the
> >   thickness at 21. (The VFA is 19) The paper is a LOT thicker 
> > than the VFA.
> 
> well - it is pretty thick, but more than anything it's really stiff
> 
> I tend to just load it on the rear sheet loader, one sheet at a time, 
> though for bigger than letter size I have also run it through the 
> main feed on the 2400
> 
> If you have the cut sheets in smaller sizes, it is 365 gsm which is 
> pretty heavy stuff
> 
> (BTW - make sure you print the correct side - my box from digital art 
> supplies was loaded upside down. Both sides of the paper are coated. 
> But I believe only the side with the greater texture is the Museuo 
> Max coating)
> 
> tim a
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.