Ernst, Are you a math scientist or what? Your volume of information always amazes me. Must be big brained. :)Mark On Feb 23, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Ernst Dinkla wrote: > Ernst Dinkla wrote: > > > I think a true optical resolution > > above 3000 PPI for 4x5 and smaller isn't impossible. > > Doing the maths again and starting from the 2000 PPI true > optical resolution estimation of Rafe's 4990. > > A straight 6400/4800 x 2000 PPI (true optical resolution as > estimated by Rafe for his 4990) would give 2666 PPI true > optical resolution. But the max scan area for high resolution > is 150 x 247 mm ( Effective pixels data) which probably means > the windows of the twin 4x5 holder are not in the length. The > 216 x 297 mm area for the lower resolution used means that if > there's 2000 PPI true optical resolution on the total width of > the bed ( Rafe's estimation for his 4990) the high resolution > should be about 2880 PPI true optical resolution (216/150 x > 2000). The smaller angle of the lens and the less DOF needed > with the dual lens system may get it over the 3000 PPI mark. > If the twin 4x5 holder had the windows lengthwise then the > stroke of the lens for higher resolution doesn't have to be > wider than 95 mm (4 inch minus the unexposed borders). That > could have brought the resolution near 4500 PPI. All based on > one axis calculation. There are probably other (optical) > limitations though that make this wishful thinking. > > Ernst > > > -- > Ernst Dinkla > > > www.pigment-print.com > ( unvollendet ) > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� > in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Digital wedding photography Learn digital photography Digital > photography college > Digital photography Digital photography web site Digital > photography course > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanner
2006-02-23 by Mark Savoia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.