Ginny wrote: > >And, I must admit, I still have NOT bought a digital camera. I'm >>waiting for something in the 12-14 megpixel range to be affordable. >>Or has that happened alrdy? At 5:32 AM +0000 2/22/06, Clayton Jones responded: >"Affordable" is relative, of course. Probably the Canon 5D is the >best thing going right now, 12mp and about $3K. The 20D, at 8mp, is >another excellent price/image quality deal at about $1.5K (and the >Rebel XT is even lower cost for same image quality, just lacks some >features). I'm using an 8mp Canon Pro-1 (smaller sensor than 20D, so >lesser image quality). 8mp is enough to make acceptable 11x14s and >still have room to crop. I consider it to be the minimum acceptable >resolution. > Nikon's brand new D200 should be considered. Full comparison table between the 5D, 20D and the D200: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond200/page25.asp That page also includes a nice bit offering some perspective on the megapixel chase. -- jonathan wills _______ wills design portland, oregon, usa
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Few B&W 2400 questions
2006-02-23 by jonathan wills
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.