From David Dorn <Here is where Epson's arrogance comes in. I print mainly B&W. <Epson's matte is simply too warm. Now don't tell me they don't know <it. Ebony is the only 3rd non Epson ink I use in my 2200. All they <have to do is make an alternative ink and I would be 100% Epson. I'm not sure Epson is the one that is arrogant here. "Epson's matte is simply too warm.... All they have to do is make and alternative ink and I would be 100% Epson." Let me get this straight, you are saying Epson should use your opinion, (one that I happen not to agree with) and if they changed their product based on that opinion everything would be fine. Frankly I'm not exactly sure which side of this lawsuit I will end up on. All I can tell you is that I like my 2400, I am very happy with the prints, which are all B&W. I would like to have less expensive carts, but compared to the sale price of a print, ink is a negligible cost. Consumers always have the right to vote with their checkbook. I know that some see this as Epson's attempt to eliminate that right. I'm not sure if there is a viable market for third party inks and cartridges, Epson will ever be able to eliminate the competition. Gary www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown baffin@...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson files lawsuits
2006-02-26 by Gary Brown
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.